Migration, climate change, terrorism and widening social gaps are pressing global issues that are communicated through the news media, spread by social media and discussed in high-level summits as well as around dinner tables. Ultimately, they concern the legitimacy of democracy, the foundations of welfare states and the construction of cultural identities. Yet the links between communication, legitimacy and social resilience are often neglected. In a paper authored by Eli Skogerbø and myself we discuss how political communication is a purveyor of social resilience. We focus on the communicative conditions that impact on the sustainability of political systems. The paper has been accepted for the conference “Media and Politics in Times of Crises and Change,” @ the London School of Economics, December 12-13 2016.
Ketil Raknes from Kristiania University College and I have just had a paper accepted for a ICA preconference in Tokyo called Powers of Promotion: Apprehending the Social and Political Impacts of Promotional Culture. Ketil and I will talk about how “the common good” is framed in professional lobbying. Appeals to what is “best for society” are common in lobbying campaigns as non-elected political actors have to argue beyond their self-interest. Lobbying campaigns that use the news media are likely to put even more emphasis on the common good-argument.
Our edited volume on Norwegian political communication Makt, medier og politikk [Power, media and politics] got a rave review in the latest issue of Kommunikasjon. Quote: “Finally, we have a standard reference work on political communication in Norwegian”. Dare I say: Mission accomplished?
I have committed an edited volume on Norwegian political communication together with a bunch of the best Norwegian academics and a couple of good colleagues from our neighbouring countries. The volume clocks in on 362 pages and the first section offers chapters discussing how political communication is treated in different academic fields (think political science, media studies, rhetoric). Then follows a section focusing on different actors and institutions (political parties, commentators, public relations agencies, etc.), and a section on channels, platforms and processes (election campaigns, speeches, social media, etc.). The book is rounded of with a conclusion chapter and three commentaries from key scholars in the field. 24 chapters in total. I have a hand on the wheel of the intrdocution adn conclusion, as well as the chapters on public relations and lobbying. Again: Brush up on your Norwegian skills!
There is a lot of buzz around our POLKOM group these days: This fall the one and only Frank Esser will be joining us as an adjunct (Professor II), Cristina Archetti from Salford will start as a fulltime associate professor, and Karoline Andera Ihlebæk as a post.doc. We also have vacancies for two PhD fellowships. On October 21 we launch POLCOM – Norwegian Center for Political Communication with a seminar at the U of Oslo with keynotes from Frank Esser, Toril Aalberg and Eli Skogerbø. The day after we launch an edited volume (sorry, only in Norwegian) on political communication in Norway.
The POLKOM-group in my dep has two openings for those eager to get a PhD within political communication. One of these positions is earmarked political journalism, whereas the other is dedicated to forms of influence on political decision-making processes, e.g. lobbying, political mobilization and influence through social media. You will be joining a happening and prioritized group in the dep.
Eli Skogerbø and I just had a panel accepted for The 2015 International Communication Association Nordic Regional Conference that is to be held October 11-13 at Copenhagen Business School. The title of the panel is “Building in Paradise? Political Communication Theory and Practices in the Scandinavian Countries”. The panel focuses on the political communication in the Nordic countries, which can be seen as both a result of and an enabler of the Nordic model. Thus, the panel places itself in the comparative tradition of political communication research looking at differences and similarities across Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Eli and I will present a paper calld “Some of us have talked,” and we will be joined by Sine Nørholm Just (Copenhagen Business School) presenting the paper “”The Denmark you know” – political privilege and radical rhetoric in ’the world’s happiest country” and Lars Nord (Mid Sweden University) who will present “From The Middle Way to Somewhere in The Middle”.